Like other developers, I could just list and praise the ones I use or one could go for the crowdsourced solution of crantastic. I also mean that some packages offer fundamental abstractions that you are likely to want in your toolset for one reason or another, whereas others have more specific goals, for instance they implement a specialized class of models or are companions for books and classes and so forth. ![]() When I talk about quality, I don't mean only "difficult to use", "buggy" or "slow", albeit that happens too. But the number is overwhelming - 5000 is the last I've heard and the growth is exponential - and the quality variable. The availability of a wide variety of packages has been long highlighted as one of the strengths of the R language. Much has been said about the richness of the system of packages for R, but where is one supposed to start?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |